As experience in the curriculum of temporary workers who will participate in the next contest school in 2016, are worth the years of teaching from alternate , but not those as full professors indefinitely . It’s strange reasoning of the Education Ministry, which decided to limit exclusively to fixed-term contracts enhancement of the service provided in the peer institutions. A question is not insignificant, since 2016 the competition will be the first to assign a score (decisive for the final ranking) to years of teaching. And where they are immediately triggered controversy teachers and appeals threats . “It is a discrimination all too blatant and without any legal basis,” says Marcellus Pacific , Chairman of the category ANIEF union. “We’ve talked to our lawyers.”
I’m excited for days about 200 thousand qualified that should participate in the next concorsone : There is time until March 30 to register . In teachers online application must also provide the titles and the service, which this year will be a decisive factor (worth 20 of 100 total points on the list, after passing the written and the oral one). And the Ministry of Education has published a series of FAQ (frequently asked question) to give instructions on proper data entry. The latter, however, have raised a fuss again on the evaluation of years of service, particularly in peer institutions – as is known – since 2000 included in the single education system, recognized by the State to all effects. The ministry has decided to validate only the years of teaching as a substitute, and not those of someone who has worked with an employment contract.
In fact, the position of the Ministry of Education is not new. L ‘ exclusion of permanent contract was already present in the text of the reform: the Law 107, art. 114, paragraph b, clearly speaks of “service provided at a given time in the school and education of all levels.” But in recent days the FAQ # 14 seemed to have opened the doors to the assumptions in the private. Nothing to do: it was just a “ material error “, admitted and corrected in a hurry by the Ministry, but has created more confusion and controversy on the subject. “It is absurd: I already had a little score, so I do not have at all ,” writes Laura on one of the many Facebook groups of teachers who are preparing for the competition. “Incompetent, before they write one thing, then another. What should we do? “, Adds Manuela.
The position of the Ministry has its own logic, however twisted: the competition is not open to teachers who are already in place, . For this is only rated the service by alternate criterion it is also extended to private. But it is obvious that teachers employed in private will be interested in the competition, and so will end up being victims of a clear disparity : does scoring work as substitutes, but not as permanent teachers. “ It is patently illegitimate “, says Marcello Pacific ANIEF union. “At that point they should prohibit their participation to those who are employed, or exclude any service in the playing field. It would still be subject to appeal, but at least it would make sense. So instead is pure discrimination agree that we are on the side of the precarious, but evaluating the years of substitution and not the role is absurd. “
Also because often Matching despitefully use of temporary workers, making them work free in exchange for the score. And we are penalized the few serious institutions offering a true open-ended contract. “It is one of many to challenge profiles of this notice,” concludes the Pacific. “We are already working to appeal in court: there all the time, since the valuation of securities and take over service only after the tests passed.” Meanwhile, however, teachers must enter the data on the portal and do not know quite what to do. One more hurdle on the path to the fixed place .
Twitter: @lVendemiale
– >
No comments:
Post a Comment