We have some difficulty in reviewing the last managerial citizen of Focus Home Interactive. Before you give other explanations go reread the review of Cities XL 2012 Rosario Salatiello. If you look in against it says “Lack of novelty.” A list the new features in Cities XXL takes very little: we have support for multicore, some building in more advanced ones and a general review of the interface, the which is even difficult to realize, and that, frankly, does not improve then who knows what the Cities XL Platinum. It is a photocopy of Cities XL Platinum The new interface are not even exceptional Basically a big patch sold at full price 
If we had put a picture of Cities XL Platinum you will not realize you would be Now we jump to the review of CITES XL 2011. What can be read in against? “After the collapse of the online component for the 2009 edition, this new chapter is a sort of big patch”. Rebuild for slower: the 2012 edition was unoriginal compared to the 2011 edition, which in turn seemed a big patch of that in 2009. If you want we can add that in 2013 came out Cities XL Platinum, a kind of final version of Cities XL 2012 with all the additional content published over the months, as well as various bug fixes and various adjustments of the gameplay. By now you should have figured out by yourself, but it is best to explain: the greatest difficulty that we found in reviewing Cities XXL is that the more we played, the more we remained surprised how than was like … no, not like that, identical to the previous edition, to the point that we could take one of the reviews above it and use almost all the concepts without hesitation. Wishing we could kill Salatiello, delete the article and then riproporvelo with X more in the title and there would be problems of consistency. We have often spoken of securities similar to its predecessors, but in most cases it is a way of saying to indicate that there is little originality in the gameplay or the plot or in other aspects. In this case, unfortunately, the statement should be interpreted so ruthlessly literal. New …
We say that the impression is that we have moved a few buttons and you have added some, irrelevant options, just to be able to claim to have made some changes. The basic functions have remained identical to those of the past. For the rest we have the same dynamics of the game, the same progression, the same buildings, the same buildings, the same vehicles and pedestrians, and so on. In short, you take a virgin territory, there are placed over building land and you look to grow the urban fabric, intervening where there are more pressing demands. Missing work for the workers? They build factories or shops. Serve executives for technology companies? They build building areas dedicated high bourgeoisie. We have a beautiful lake to be exploited? Then we build hotels for tourists and so on. When our city has achieved considerable size and is well characterized by the economic point of view, you can start fruitful exchanges with other cities in order to compensate for what we lack and maybe gain something from the surplus. The trouble is that did the exact same things in Cities XL Platinum, with the same results, because graphically it was not done even half a step forward and recycling of three-dimensional models is total. The same goes for the multiplayer, where innovations can be counted on the fingers of one hand of a maimed. It is worth considering Cities XXL only if you have never tried a series title, otherwise you must wait for the upcoming Cities Skylines of Colossal Order, which promises at least some news from the point of view of the visual and gameplay.
Cities XXL – Launch Trailer 
Requirements PC System
Cons
No comments:
Post a Comment