Monday, April 22, 2013

Apple vs. Foxconn on quality: 8 million iPhone back in ... - The Republic

The cost is estimated at $ 250 million. To manufacturing defects is also blamed for the lack of iPhone 5 is initially present on the market. For the Chinese company smartphone has been particularly difficult to produce, and for the 5S Apple will open to other partners builders

EIGHT MILLIONS of iPhone back in the factory. And for the future model 5S, Foxconn is not the only manufacturer under contract with Apple, as has occurred in recent years. IPhone sales actually continue to grow, but Apple does not seem happy with the work of the partner. Eight million units have in fact returned to Apple, returned for flaws or defects in workmanship. Not only cosmetic defects, but also of operation, which as it rebuilds from Apple imputerebbe completely Foxconn. And these ottio million smartphones will all return to China, where presumably will be regenerated to adhere to specific quality control. Into The cost is estimated at $ 250 million, not a few even for the large liquidity of Apple. And just to manufacturing defects observed by Apple is also blamed for the lack of iPhone 5 is initially present on the market at the time of launch, Foxconn responded that the smartphone was particularly difficult to produce, with its aesthetic features and the joints between glass and metal . In any case, Apple will add contractor for the production of the iPhone 5S.

The new model is expected in June, at least it is the presentation. For the actual availability on the market there will probably be to wait a few weeks. The innovations will be both aesthetic and internal, with particular emphasis on the following basis: a more powerful chip and

a more powerful camera are almost taken for granted, but there should also be new features, such as NFC and fingerprint recognition, and probably the introduction of other colors for the chassis in addition to the classic black and white.
src=”http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif”

No comments:

Post a Comment