Station Hawaiian detection of CO2 at Mauna Loa
rising sea levels. Well, lâ?? ™ EU has always been allâ? ™ on the front edge of the containment of CO2, adhering to Kyoto without hesitation, setting up a trading system as lâ?? ™ ETS (Emission Trading Scheme). And putting stringent constraints on emissions of its fleet (the 2020 limit of 95 grams of CO2 per kilometer which lâ?? ™ mainland industry is vehemently opposed). A few days ago, though, the European Parliament has changed direction, rejecting the proposal to delete a package of significant  «permissions inquinare”, a move that would have supported the price of one ton of CO2, from time to a minimum. Without a  «prezzo” of CO2 is unlikely that the objectives of containment (such as IEA) can be centered: no one would have an interest in not pollute . The reason for the  “Noa” is clear: European companies in crisis do not want to incur additional costs. All true, but so lâ?? ™ Europe is at a crossroads: bet on green economy and think long, or not to wei gh on its production system, but risk losing the train.
Twitter @ stefanoagnoli
class=”separator”
No comments:
Post a Comment